Statutory Interpretation
← Non Petroleum Productions in the Arabian Gulf Countries | Business Communication Trends → |
Statutory interpretation is a case where the judge is mandated to construe the statute meaning of the clause or words in order to establish and verify how it will be injected in a similar or different case. This is also known is Australia also as the judicial interpretation, and it is frequently formulated and injected to cases as judicial precedents. The judges are mandated to make laws while trying to understand an Act meaning, this is due to the different reasons that make it sometime unclear of how to exercise the Act, one of this reason maybe that the language that parliament used is confusing and vague (Australian Law Postgraduate Network, 155). This makes the words in the Acts to need more elucidation and explanation; this is contemplated by the statute interpretation of the meaning and intent of the words.
This assignment is going to offer legal advice two fact situations, which are found in possession of Prohibited Chemicals which are punishable offences, this comes after a radical movement group acclaimed that they will poison all public water systems in Australia. On January 2010 Helena (20) and her brother Jonathon (14) found in possession of “Cleano” and on the same month of 2010 Lucia was discovered importing large amount of “Methalin” from South America and storing it in the basement of her house.
Fact situation 1, Helena and Jonathon
Offence- Found in possession of a deadly chemical (Cleano) prohibited under fictitious Act known as the Importation of Prohibited Chemicals Act 2010 (Cth) On 30 September 2009. This act is very severe to the offender and in Australia which has been recently enforced.
Advice- The best advice I would advice that Helena and Jonathan, is to stick to their statement that the chemical Cleano belonged to Jonathan and was in the hotel without the acknowledgement of Helena, this is because under the Prohibited Chemicals Act 2010 (Cth) section 3, which is interpreted as prohibited chemical falls in the group of toxic chemicals and dangerous substances. In this section a child is defined as a person under the age of 16 years, importation is interpreted as shipment in and out of the country, state and within own property (Elhauge, 220).
Under section 4 of the Prohibited Chemicals Act (2010), if a person under this provision is 16 years younger and is in possession of the prohibited chemicals then they are excluded from the penalties that are executed to the person (adult) who is under this section interpreted as any person over the age of 16 (Pearce & Geddes, 100).
Helena if admitting to have awareness to the acknowledgement of prohibited chemicals in the hotel they were residing would make her guilty of the offense under section 3 and 4. This will make her be so because she is 20 years of age, and under the interpretation of section 4 of the Prohibited Chemicals Act (2010) it states that severe reprimanding shall be induced to any person found in possession of any prohibited chemical in Australia (Australian Law Postgraduate Network, 177).
I would argue them to stick to their alibi of Jonathan being the one that has the possession of the prohibited chemicals. Because Helena in the statement stated that she was not aware of the chemical in the room, this makes her not guilty of any offence under interpretation of section 4. This interpretation although Jonathan has a record of juvenile misconducts will excuse him on the basis that he falls on the provision that interprets him as a child and the law under section 4, have no penalties if the chemicals are found being possessed by a person under the age of 16 years (child).
In conclusion the case of Helen and Jonathan has no big impact as the chemical where bout and acknowledgement belong only to the child (Jonathan) and as the prohibited Chemical Act (2010) elucidates that a person under the age of 16 years will not be held punishable if found under the possession of the prohibited chemicals. Looking at the matter in a psychological angle it is acknowledgeable that the relationship between two teenage siblings is not that great, this is especially if they are of different gender. This illustrates that Jonathan could have had the chemical without the acknowledgement of her sister. Unless this case is like Kartinyeri v The Commonwealth (1998) 195 CLR 337, where the majority view was very much dissected. However, section 4 clearly takes Helena out of the reign of being help into possession of the prohibited chemicals, and under the same interpretation due to Jonathan (14) age which this section defines as a child and has not punishable provision for person under the age of 16 years. This will make the case be excused by the merit of the possession and ownership of the chemical belonging to Jonathan who is below the age level which the Act states for punishment (Kartinyeri v The Commonwealth, 1998).
Fact situation 2, Lucia
Offence- Found in possession of a deadly chemical (Methalin) prohibited under fictitious Act known as the Importation of Prohibited Chemicals Act (2010), Lucia was discovered that she was importing Methalin which is one of the prohibited drug in the Prohibited Chemicals Act (2010). The offenders of this crime are under section 5 of the Prohibited Chemical Act Punishable by either life imprisonment or death sentence (Statute Law Review, 182).
However, there is an exclusion that permit if the offender is a permanent residence in Australia compensate for his/her action by the commonwealth to sell off their property for compensation this provision is interpreted under section 5 (2). Though the law strengthened by act which the commonwealth parliament in her second reading Mary Anne McAdams MP said should add more enforcement when addressing a threat issued out by a certain radical group.
Advice- The offense here is very severe as Lucia not only has possession but also imports Methalin which among the most condoned chemicals in Australia. The evidence in her basement are the most darning aspect of the whole case. Under section 5(1) Lucia faces death or life imprisonment in the face, however the same Act elucidates that under section 7 that the only reason that the Commonwealth Chemicals Commission have the right of search and seizure of a person or property is in the case that that particular person has violated section 4 and 5 of the prohibited chemical act (2010) and also the interpretation of section 3 which articulates that the chemical unless regarded in very bad hands and unless expressed to the contrary manner (Winckel, 189).
In the case although there was a discovery and that Lucia is well over the child age limit for execution if a person is fond in possession of the prohibited chemicals. However, the commission not taking further action does not mean that they have stopped investigating Lucia. This means they are investigating her for a reasonable proof (Statute Law Review, 197). Therefore, in the case that she was found in violation of the prohibited chemical Act section 4 and 5, then she can as the act under section 5(2) which allows the sale of property for compensation purposes may let her house be sold for compensation.
The legality question here arises making the Lucia have the upper hand of the ownership and the interpretation of the ownership of the prohibited chemicals. This is best observed in the case where the judgment of O’Connor J in Potter v Minahan interpretation was formulated on “there shall be overthrowing of fundamental principles, general system of law departure and infringe rights as the last degree implausible, this in the view of not clear and irresistible of intention expression; and this would simply b authenticated through assumptions in their natural, widest or usual sense that would offer a meaning which was not even targeted in the first place” (Potter v Minahan, 1908)
Therefore as the authority have not accessed or taken evidence from Lucia all that I would advice her no to do is to dispose of the prohibited chemicals. This is because if the right investigation is carried through then the consequences are very severe to Lucia; this comes as she faces life imprisonment or a death sentence. However, section 5(2) allows any common wealth offenders who have property to sell so that they may compensate on the punishment that would have been allocated to them. This is another angle that would advice Lucia on in the case that she was ever found guilty or the commission decides to search and follow up the investigation and apprehend her (Australian Law Postgraduate Network, 203).
In conclusion basically the hands of the Commonwealth Chemicals Commission are kind tied and the most fundamental aspect that should be noted is the fact that the Profited Chemical Act (2010) under section 5 (2) makes exception to the nationality of this states as they do not represent threat to their own country but are also legible for sale of their property this is done to facilitate compensation (Gotsis, 57). When the Commonwealth Chemicals Commission took no action it means that there was no logical thing that they found alarming with Lucia having possession of the Prohibited chemical or the search was unlawfully committed.
- Business Communication Trends
- Big Drive Auto
- Non Petroleum Productions in the Arabian Gulf Countries
- US Consumer Behavior
![]() |
Morgan W.
Eugene, OR
|
|
I don’t see how anyone could write a paper about something as boring as the psychology of the two year old, could make it sound so interesting, but your writers managed to pull it off. Thank you for putting forth such a concerted effort to do a good job. I really appreciate it. I will use your service again |
![]() |
Grace T.
Purcell, OK
|
|
Thank you for assuring that only the best writers work for you. It doesn’t matter which writer has been assigned to my projects since I started using your services. Every time I get a paper written, it is perfect. |
![]() |
Enrico V.
San Diego, CA
|
|
I was really happy about the speedy turn around time for my paper. It is rare to find a writing service that can write things so quickly without taking away from their quality. Hats off to EssaysEmpire.com! |
![]() |
Mark R.
Seattle, WA
|
|
I am so happy with my term paper. The writer did a spectacular job!! Thanks to the writing team and also to the customer service team. |
![]() |
Millie P.
Jackson, WY
|
|
Thanks goes out to the writer who filled my order. He did everything right the first time around. I had to ask for one tiny revision, but that was my own fault for leaving it out of the directions. |
![]() |
Royce E.
Dallas, TX
|
|
I first approached EssaysEmpire.com with skepticism. However, now, I have none. I am convinced that you are probably the best writing service on the Internet. Plus, you don’t overcharge, as so many writing services do. Thank you for the quality writing at affordable prices. You offer such a valuable service to students such as me. |
![]() |
Zola R.
Salulita, MX
|
|
The paper that I bought from EssaysEmpire.com was a whole lot better than I thought it would be. Thank you for the excellent service and product. I will be happy to recommend you to my friends. |
![]() |
Sharon Q.
Lexington, OK
|
|
Working with your writers is always such a pleasure. Thanks again. |
![]() |
Glynnis H.
Ft. Smith, AR
|
|
Hello! I just had to stop what I was doing to let you know how grateful I am that I found your excellent writing service. I have had to use you three times now, and each time, I have been 100% satisfied with the work that you did. Your writers are absolutely outstanding. I am very, very happy with everything you have written for me. |
![]() |
Doreen A.
Malibu, CA
|
|
Due to a family emergency, I was unable to complete a very important paper. Thanks to EssaysEmpire.com, I was able to hand in a well written paper and not sacrifice my grade. I will be forever grateful to your writing service for providing such outstanding work. Thank you so much. |
![]() |
Langley R.
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
One of the things that I appreciate most about EssaysEmpire.com, is that they don’t resell your paper. Only you own it, if you hire them to write something. Other writing services that I have used, just circulate the same paper over and over, and if you get caught turning one in, too bad. You are expelled. EssaysEmpire.com will even give you a plagiarism report after they run it through their anti-plagiarism check. Such details set EssaysEmpire.com above the rest. |
![]() |
Rob B.
Tulsa, OK
|
|
I needed APA formatting, EssaysEmpire.com’s writers gave me APA formatting. I needed 2000 words. EssaysEmpire.com’s writers gave me 2000 words. I needed an A+ on my paper to bring up my GPA. EssaysEmpire.com gave me a paper that got an A+. I am a happy person, thanks to EssaysEmpire.com! |
![]() |
Trilly M.
Spokane, WA
|
|
I just had to let you know how much I appreciated receiving a paper back that was of quality that high. I will recommend your writing service to other people I know. You guys do great work. |
![]() |
Judy C.
Bolingbrook, IL
|
|
I have used EssaysEmpire.com for two years now, and I wouldn’t even consider trying another writing service. I am convinced that there is no other service as good as EssaysEmpire.com, and I only want to work with the best. EssaysEmpire.com has given me well written papers that have come in well before their deadlines, every time. I am happy with EssaysEmpire.com and commit to sticking with them. |
![]() |
Susan L.
Ashland, OR
|
|
The writer who worked on my paper far exceeded what I asked of him. The paper is better than I thought it would be. I got an A+ on it! Thanks! |
![]() |
Joyce T.
New Orleans, LA
|
|
I was trying to choose between EssaysEmpire.com and another online writing service and I didn’t know which one to pick. Then, I began to read reviews. I didn’t read even one thing negative about EssaysEmpire.com, and the other site was fraught with complaints. I went with EssaysEmpire.com, and it turned out that all the good things I had read about the service were true. My paper was fully guaranteed, but it was A-1 quality. The customer service people were great. The prices were right. Now, I am a devoted fan. When I need help with my writing, I go straight to EssaysEmpire.com! |
![]() |
Louise O.
Oakland, CA.
|
|
The A+ that I got on the paper that I ordered from you, helped boost my grade up an entire letter grade! Thanks, EssaysEmpire.com! |
![]() |
Mark C.
Mexico City, MX
|
|
Thanks to EssaysEmpire.com, I was able to keep my GPA up and will be graduating soon. I really needed assistance with my writing. I aced everything else, but I have always had problems expressing myself in writing. The writers at EssaysEmpire.com took the ball and ran with it! Because of them, I am going to graduate. Thank you, from the bottom of my heart, for all of the valuable assistance. |
![]() |
Benjamin P.
Beaumont, TX
|
|
Thank you for your diligence! Your writers got it right down to the last word! I appreciate how closely they paid attention. |
![]() |
Steve P.
Portland, OR
|
|
I am beginning to understand why your writing service was recommended to me so highly. Everything you do is a cut above your competition. You’re really great! |